Click Here To Advertise! Click Here To Advertise!

KFMC -
News
Markets
Weather
Sports
Contests
About KSUM
About KFMC
Advertising


Click here to get started.

EEO Information
Fairmont Area Events Calendar
Project 1590
Classic KFMC on Facebook
KSUM Country on Facebook
Minnesota Road Info
Iowa Road Info
Fairmont Public Schools
Granada-Huntley-East Chain Schools
Martin County West Schools
Martin Luther High School
Truman Public Schools
City of Fairmont
Visit Fairmont Minnesota
Martin County Government
Blizzard Snowmobile Club
Martin County Humane Society

News


05/16/2017

A diverse group of agriculture advocacy stakeholders has sent a letter to Gov. Dayton urging him to consider a series of changes to Minnesota’s controversial buffer strip requirement. Please see below for a statement from Sen. Julie Rosen and the full text of the letter.

“Talk to almost any farmer or agriculture professional in Minnesota, and chances are they’ll have concerns about the buffer strip requirement. It has been extremely difficult for Greater Minnesota to accommodate the governor’s wishes on the buffer law for a number of reasons. It was rushed into law without advice or feedback from farmers – with no plans to reimburse them for the land they would be forced to remove from production and without a strategy to help local governments enforce the law. I’ve worked hard with my colleagues in the legislature on ideas to fix the buffer requirement using input from all stakeholders, in order to find a final package that meets the needs of lawmakers, environment groups, and the ag community. I hope the governor listens to the concerns expressed in this letter, because farmers need some relief.”



The full text of the letter is as follows:



May 11, 2017

Dear Governor Dayton and Legislative Leaders,

As farmers and local government officials, we are writing to you with an urgent request with respect to the water buffer law that has become the subject of considerable controversy throughout rural Minnesota. While we are not advocating the repeal of the new buffer law, we must face the fact it is not ready for implementation this year under the current provisions.

Our hope is the Legislature and the Governor could come to a satisfactory agreement yet this legislative session on the critical modifications that are needed for this new law to be effectively implemented. Specifically, changes are needed in the classifications of private vs. public ditches, clarifications on what constitutes acceptable alternative practices and some form of compensation and/or property tax relief for the taking of productive farmland out of production.

Implementation of this new law will be challenging under the best of circumstances. If no modifications are made prior to May 22nd, implementation of the new buffer law will be extremely challenging for the following reasons:

There are provisions of the buffer law that are not clear and it is causing confusion among both farmers and local government officials.
Local government officials throughout the state are having problems interpreting the new law, and helping farmers with compliance will be very challenging.
Crop farmers are already in the field with planting, beginning their busiest cycle of the year through the fall harvest – getting into compliance by November 1st is a real hardship.
Approved alternative practices were released just last month with more information forthcoming, making it extremely difficult for land owners to both decide and implement alternatives prior to the beginning of the planting season. With these alternative practices being crucial for many farmers concerned about the loss of productive land, more time to implement is necessary.
The lack of financial consideration for the taking of productive farmland is troubling, especially at a time when farmers are experiencing multiple years of low prices and financial stress.
If the Legislature and Governor cannot negotiate acceptable modifications to the buffer law prior to the legislative adjournment, we would respectfully, but strongly, request delaying the implementation effective date of the buffer law. This would not only allow farmers to have the time to understand the law and how best to get into compliance, but also give local government officials more time to decide how to best enforce the law. With insufficient funding in place for county boards and watershed districts, executing the buffer law will be a major issue for local officials.

We stand ready to assist. Thank you.

Chicken and Egg Assn. of Minnesota
Cooperative Network
Minnesota AgriGrowth Council
Minnesota Assn. of Wheat Growers
Minnesota Barely Growers Assn.
Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative
Minnesota Corn Growers Assn.
Minnesota Farm Bureau
Minnesota Farmers Union
Minnesota Milk Producers Assn.
Minnesota Pork Producers Assn.
Minnesota Soybean Growers Assn.
Minnesota State Cattlemen’s Assn.
Minnesota Turf Seed Council
Minnesota Turkey Growers Assn.
Northern Plains Potato Growers Assn.
Red River Valley Sugarbeet Growers Assn.
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative

Ron Antony, Yellow Medicine County Commissioner
Eric Christensen, Kittson County Administrator
Theresia Gillie, Kittson County Commissioner
Harlan Madsen, Kandiyohi County Commissioner
Corey Wikstrom, Kittson County Commissioner
Joe Bouvette, Kittson County Commissioner
Bob Fox, Renville County Commissioner, Chair
Bobbie Harder, Sibley County Commissioner
Leon Olson, Kittson County Commissioner
Betty Younggren, Kittson County Commissioner, Chair

cc: All members of the Minnesota House and Senate


ROD HALVORSEN
© 2015 KSUM KFMC


Back


Click Here To Advertise!
Click Here To Advertise!

| HOME PAGE | NEWS | MARKETS | EMPLOYMENT | WEATHER |
| SPORTS | CONTESTS | ABOUT KSUM | ABOUT KFMC |
| ADVERTISING | HIDDEN PAGES |


© 2017 KFMC 106, KSUM 1370 -- All Rights Reserved.

Lawrence and Schiller: Putting the Web to Work